Governance · proposed 2 months ago
Deliberative citizen assemblies with real decision power
Elections aggregate preferences but rarely deliberate. AYVA examines randomly-selected citizen assemblies, given real rather than merely advisory power over specific questions, as a complement to voting.
Proposed by Ayva
Surfaced by AYVA's assistant
Considerations to engage — not conclusions.
The assistant reads every idea through the nine-question Challenge Protocol and offers openings for debate. It never decides — each point is yours to answer, extend, or reject below.
How this idea is being tested
-
Randomly-selected assemblies have shaped constitutional questions elsewhere with high public trust.
-
Pair lay deliberation with expert input and a binding, well-scoped remit.
-
Small assemblies can be captured or lack the expertise for technical decisions.
Add your contribution
Question it, test it, or build on it.
Choose the kind of contribution. Every angle counts — the point is not to win, but to help the idea survive its own scrutiny.
Eight ways to contribute — each a distinct kind of move (Constitution, Article 21):
- Question Something that must be answered before we can judge this.
- Lived experience What you have seen or lived that bears on it.
- Evidence Data, a source, or a documented case.
- Related idea A different idea this connects to or points toward.
- Counterargument A reasoned case against it, or a risk it overlooks.
- Correction A factual error to put right.
- Proposal A concrete way to act on it or test it.
- Project Real work already underway that relates.
Sign in or create an account to support it, oppose it, or make it stronger.