Governance · proposed 2 months ago · ExamplePiloting
A citizens' review panel for every large public contract
Before any contract over a set threshold is signed, a small randomly-selected panel of residents reviews it in plain language and publishes questions the awarding body must answer.
Proposed by Devi Rao
Pilot · from debate to the real world
Citizens' review panel — Ward 5 trial
- Steward
- Devi Rao
- Scope
- One ward, three contracts
- What we measure
- Questions raised; awarding-body response rate
- Safeguards
- Opt-in panellists; conflict-of-interest declared
- Review
- 2026-09-05
Field log
- 1 month agoFirst set of questions published; awaiting the awarding body's response.
- 1 month agoPanel selected and briefed; first contract under review this week.
Surfaced by AYVA's assistant
Considerations to engage — not conclusions.
The assistant reads every idea through the nine-question Challenge Protocol and offers openings for debate. It never decides — each point is yours to answer, extend, or reject below.
How this idea is being tested
-
Sortition panels on public spending have improved trust where trialled.
-
How do you keep the randomly-selected panel from being captured by lobbyists?
Add your contribution
Question it, test it, or build on it.
Choose the kind of contribution. Every angle counts — the point is not to win, but to help the idea survive its own scrutiny.
Eight ways to contribute — each a distinct kind of move (Constitution, Article 21):
- Question Something that must be answered before we can judge this.
- Lived experience What you have seen or lived that bears on it.
- Evidence Data, a source, or a documented case.
- Related idea A different idea this connects to or points toward.
- Counterargument A reasoned case against it, or a risk it overlooks.
- Correction A factual error to put right.
- Proposal A concrete way to act on it or test it.
- Project Real work already underway that relates.
Sign in or create an account to support it, oppose it, or make it stronger.